<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Xavier Adam Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xavieradam.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk</link>
	<description>public relations, media and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Can a bus look good? by James Cove</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/can-a-bus-look-good/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavieradam.co.uk/?p=121#comment-242</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea for a campaign - if I see it on the back of a bus it would certainly make me smile, though I am writing this from Switzerland, so unlikley to for the time being.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea for a campaign &#8211; if I see it on the back of a bus it would certainly make me smile, though I am writing this from Switzerland, so unlikley to for the time being.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not media, marketing or public relations! by Esther Porta</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/not-media-marketing-or-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther Porta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavieradam.co.uk/?p=118#comment-228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, you write with such gusto about skiing and travelling! You go for it and hit those  slopes! Enjoy!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you write with such gusto about skiing and travelling! You go for it and hit those  slopes! Enjoy!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not media, marketing or public relations! by maurice flynn</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/not-media-marketing-or-public-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>maurice flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavieradam.co.uk/?p=118#comment-227</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;great article Xav!!! ps dont forget skiing in Bulgaria - better than you expect - great for a long weekend - and the off piste is superb with a good (and very cheap) local guide :)))&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article Xav!!! ps dont forget skiing in Bulgaria &#8211; better than you expect &#8211; great for a long weekend &#8211; and the off piste is superb with a good (and very cheap) local guide :)))</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand Psyche by Xavier</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=116#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Ben, I agree. The new advert reminded me of the older advert, I know the original brand, but struggle to recollect the new &#039;pretender&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben, I agree. The new advert reminded me of the older advert, I know the original brand, but struggle to recollect the new &#8216;pretender&#8217;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand Psyche by Ben Hedges</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hedges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=116#comment-203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, to steal a phrase from the financial world,  &quot;the value of brand goodwill can go down as well as up...&quot;
Perhaps someone has done some proper research on this, but after quick discussion round the office here we&#039;re of the general opinion that it is the copy-cat brand that loses out in these situations as the consumer is reminded of the original brand, and often even thinks the ad&#039; is for the original brand without registering the new one.
So if someone if copying your brand messaging it&#039;s flattering and you&#039;re obviously doing something right. In fact it can enhance your own brand.
But it&#039;s a different matter if they are a bad brand and this has a negative impact on your own.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, to steal a phrase from the financial world,  &#8220;the value of brand goodwill can go down as well as up&#8230;&#8221;
Perhaps someone has done some proper research on this, but after quick discussion round the office here we&#8217;re of the general opinion that it is the copy-cat brand that loses out in these situations as the consumer is reminded of the original brand, and often even thinks the ad&#8217; is for the original brand without registering the new one.
So if someone if copying your brand messaging it&#8217;s flattering and you&#8217;re obviously doing something right. In fact it can enhance your own brand.
But it&#8217;s a different matter if they are a bad brand and this has a negative impact on your own.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future of Television by Xavier</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=114#comment-200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Everyone, I had this anonymous comment sent in recently. Which makes interesting reading.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;We are not allowed to comment publicly on any blog; however, I completely agree with the points you raise - time moves on and the licence fee does need to be reviewed. For a lot of us working in financial services, our view of the BBC has changed so much, based on having an inside view on what they&#039;re reporting. Previously we credited the BBC brand with impartial and balanced reporting, but Robert Peston in particular, it seems, has been on a personal crusade to break exclusives based on leaks which have then had some influence on the markets. Really annoys me that I have no option but to contribute to funding that. If they&#039;re going to behave in a commercial way and race to break exclusives regardless of the consequences, they should be funded in a commercial way. They can&#039;t have their cake and eat it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Everyone, I had this anonymous comment sent in recently. Which makes interesting reading.</p>

<p>&#8220;We are not allowed to comment publicly on any blog; however, I completely agree with the points you raise &#8211; time moves on and the licence fee does need to be reviewed. For a lot of us working in financial services, our view of the BBC has changed so much, based on having an inside view on what they&#8217;re reporting. Previously we credited the BBC brand with impartial and balanced reporting, but Robert Peston in particular, it seems, has been on a personal crusade to break exclusives based on leaks which have then had some influence on the markets. Really annoys me that I have no option but to contribute to funding that. If they&#8217;re going to behave in a commercial way and race to break exclusives regardless of the consequences, they should be funded in a commercial way. They can&#8217;t have their cake and eat it.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future of Television by Xavier</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=114#comment-199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Tony C. I agree. The role of the BBC needs to be defined. I do not think the commercial sector could plug a gap left by the BBC. By its non-commercial nature it is able to offer a public service. Rather than having to chase the largest audience at any cost.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony C. I agree. The role of the BBC needs to be defined. I do not think the commercial sector could plug a gap left by the BBC. By its non-commercial nature it is able to offer a public service. Rather than having to chase the largest audience at any cost.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future of Television by Tony C</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=114#comment-197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Before there is any change to the license fee we need to establish what the BBC is for and I use the collective &#039;we&#039; deliberately.  Do we think that it&#039;s important to have a &#039;public&#039; broadcaster free from certain commerical considerations or could the commerical broadcasters fill the void if say for example the BBC ceased to exist?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once we have at least some collective idea of what the BBC is for then we can work out how to pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before there is any change to the license fee we need to establish what the BBC is for and I use the collective &#8216;we&#8217; deliberately.  Do we think that it&#8217;s important to have a &#8216;public&#8217; broadcaster free from certain commerical considerations or could the commerical broadcasters fill the void if say for example the BBC ceased to exist?</p>

<p>Once we have at least some collective idea of what the BBC is for then we can work out how to pay for it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twittle Twattle by Xavier</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/twittle-twattle/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=113#comment-194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Andy, thanks for adding your thoughts. Corporates may well listen, but what if their advisors are feeding them the wrong advice and approach!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy, thanks for adding your thoughts. Corporates may well listen, but what if their advisors are feeding them the wrong advice and approach!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twittle Twattle by Andy McMillan</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/twittle-twattle/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy McMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=113#comment-193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am just getting started on twitter and there is a lot of common sense in Xavier&#039;s views.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will the corporates listen??&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please keep pointing them in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just getting started on twitter and there is a lot of common sense in Xavier&#8217;s views.</p>

<p>Will the corporates listen??</p>

<p>Please keep pointing them in the right direction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
