<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Psyche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/</link>
	<description>marketing, strategy, finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=116#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Ben, I agree. The new advert reminded me of the older advert, I know the original brand, but struggle to recollect the new &#039;pretender&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben, I agree. The new advert reminded me of the older advert, I know the original brand, but struggle to recollect the new &#8216;pretender&#8217;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hedges</title>
		<link>http://xavieradam.co.uk/brand-phsyche/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hedges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xavadam.com/?p=116#comment-203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, to steal a phrase from the financial world,  &quot;the value of brand goodwill can go down as well as up...&quot;
Perhaps someone has done some proper research on this, but after quick discussion round the office here we&#039;re of the general opinion that it is the copy-cat brand that loses out in these situations as the consumer is reminded of the original brand, and often even thinks the ad&#039; is for the original brand without registering the new one.
So if someone if copying your brand messaging it&#039;s flattering and you&#039;re obviously doing something right. In fact it can enhance your own brand.
But it&#039;s a different matter if they are a bad brand and this has a negative impact on your own.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, to steal a phrase from the financial world,  &#8220;the value of brand goodwill can go down as well as up&#8230;&#8221;
Perhaps someone has done some proper research on this, but after quick discussion round the office here we&#8217;re of the general opinion that it is the copy-cat brand that loses out in these situations as the consumer is reminded of the original brand, and often even thinks the ad&#8217; is for the original brand without registering the new one.
So if someone if copying your brand messaging it&#8217;s flattering and you&#8217;re obviously doing something right. In fact it can enhance your own brand.
But it&#8217;s a different matter if they are a bad brand and this has a negative impact on your own.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
